Published at:
Milli Gazette and
Two CirclesLess known Quranic injunction
Turn Riba into charity
That is Zakat, Sadaqah and Qulil Afwa
(Research paper - Glasgow University International Conference on Islamic
Finance)
Dr Syed Zafar Mahmood
President, Zakat Foundation of India
www.zakatindia.org
info@zakatindia.org
Wealth must circulate
Islam's basic pillar is equality in society (Masawaat). That's one
reason why Quran prescribes for circulation of wealth across the social
spectrum. This is an important dimension of God's emphasis on developing
a wide-angled charitable disposition. The overarching purpose is to
ensure that the community's wealth does not remain confined among a few
hands; rather it keeps percolating across and circulating in the
societal body:
59.7
مَّآ أَفَآءَ ٱللَّهُ
عَلَىٰ رَسُولِهِۦ مِنْ أَهْلِ ٱلْقُرَىٰ فَلِلَّهِ وَلِلرَّسُولِ وَلِذِى
ٱلْقُرْبَىٰ وَٱلْيَتَٰمَىٰ وَٱلْمَسَٰكِينِ وَٱبْنِ ٱلسَّبِيلِ كَىْ لَا
يَكُونَ دُولَةًۢ بَيْنَ ٱلْأَغْنِيَآءِ مِنكُمْ ۚ وَمَآ ءَاتَىٰكُمُ
ٱلرَّسُولُ فَخُذُوهُ وَمَا نَهَىٰكُمْ عَنْهُ فَٱنتَهُوا۟ ۚ وَٱتَّقُوا۟
ٱللَّهَ ۖ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ شَدِيدُ ٱلْعِقَابِ
God says, what Allah has bestowed on His Messenger (and taken away) from
the people of the townships- belongs to Allah - to His Messenger and to
kindred and orphans, the needy and the wayfarer; in order that it may
not merely make a circuit among the wealthy among you. So take what
the Messenger assigns to you, and deny yourselves that which he
withholds from you. And fear Allah; for Allah is strict in punishment.
The above verse lays down the fundamental code of the economic policy in
Islamic societies and governments. Wealth should permeate the entire
community and must not remain confined among the rich.
But, as per the Divine scheme, the instruments mentioned to ensure this
are surely not confined to Zakat. If 15% of the Ummah is financially
well placed then only 2.5% of their "wealth+annual savings" will not
suffice to bring up the remaining 85% of the Ummah to the level of
economic equality all over the community. That's the reason why God has
prescribed Sadaqah. For quantifying how much Sadaqah one should give,
God has mandated the following directive principle that has mostly
missed the world's attention so far.
Qulil Afwa
2.219. وَيَسْأَلُونَكَ مَاذَا يُنفِقُونَ قُلِ الْعَفْوَ كَذَلِكَ يُبيِّنُ
اللّهُ لَكُمُ الآيَاتِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَتَفَكَّرُونَنَ
They ask you what they should spend (in God's cause and for the needy).
Say: "What is left over (after you have spent on yours and your
dependents' needs)." Thus does God make clear to you His revelations, so
that you may reflect.
Accordingly, after duly providing for self and family, whatever a person
is left with has to be given away as Sadaqah. The comparative effect of
Zakat, Sadaqa and Qulil Afwa on the society can be gauged by the matrix
shown here.
It is thus clear that for the truest implementation of God's mandate,
Muslims will have to comprehend the concept of Qulil Afwa and practice
it. Then only, the real impact of an internally coherent Muslim society
will be felt by the non-Muslim world.
Charity and Riba: mutually exclusive
In conjunction with this mandate let us also mull over the following
ayah where God has bracketed Riba and Charity in the same sentence even
though they are diagonally opposite.
2.276. يَمْحَقُ اللّهُ الْرِّبَا وَيُرْبِي الصَّدَقَاتِ وَاللّهُ
لاَ يُحِبُّ كُلَّ كَفَّارٍ أَثِيمٍ
God deprives Riba (which is thought to increase wealth) of any blessing,
and blights it, but makes alms-giving (which is thought to decrease
wealth) productive. God does not love any obstinate unbeliever, any
obstinate sinner.
Then, God goes on to further elucidate His point as follows.
30.39. وَمَا آتَيْتُم مِّن رِّباً لِّيَرْبُوَ فِي أَمْوَالِ النَّاسِ
فَلَا يَرْبُو عِندَ اللَّهِ وَمَا آتَيْتُم مِّن زَكَاةٍ تُرِيدُونَ وَجْهَ
اللَّهِ فَأُوْلَئِكَ هُمُ الْمُضْعِفُونَ
Whatever you loan to the people in usurious hope that it would return to
you increased through the goods of those people, will bring no increase
in God's sight. Whereas whatever you give in charity seeking God's
countenance (His approval and good pleasure), for those there is
increase (of recompense) multiplied.
In both these ayahs God has encouraged the human being that whenever one
is having abundance of funds and feels that one can give that money as
loan to others so that one earns money on money, one should remember
these ayahs and change the track of one's thought process and action.
Thus, leaving aside the instinct of earning more through these worldly
means which God detests, one should give away excess funds in charity to
the needy. There God promises that due to His kindness the money so
given away in charity would come back to the donor many fold. This has
been further clarified in the following ayah.
57.18. إِنَّ الْمُصَّدِّقِينَ وَالْمُصَّدِّقَاتِ وَأَقْرَضُوا اللَّهَ
قَرْضاً حَسَناً يُضَاعَفُ لَهُمْ وَلَهُمْ أَجْرٌ كَرِيمٌ
Those men and women who give alms (by spending out of their wealth in
both the obligatory and supererogatory duties of alms-giving), and lend
to God a goodly loan (by spending either in His cause or for the needy),
it will be increased manifold to their credit; and they will have an
honorable, generous reward, in addition.
Why Riba is forbidden
God has considered the person who earns money by lending money as
spiritually dis-balanced. His greedy ego vitiates the spirit of mutual
bonhomie that nurtures the sustenance of mankind. He is unmindful of
individually prospering by polluting the societal bonds of mutual
consideration.
On the other hand, the law of nature doesn't recognize a means of
livelihood that guarantees a mandated income without harboring an
element of risk. Every kind of livelihood has to be earned by incurring
material expenditure as well as human labour and this has to be
dovetailed with some fundamental inherent risk. The basic paradigm of
normal give and take in the world is based on equal terms. Profit is
earned by incurring time, labour and brains in 'producing' a commodity
that is 'bought' by those who require it. There has to be the 'pain of
creation'.
But, the money-lender goes on charging interest repeatedly and the
quantum is ever increasing. The profit which the debtor makes on the
money of the creditor, however large it may be, has after all its
in-built limits, but there is no restraint on the interest the creditor
may charge on his money. He may even appropriate all the earnings of the
debtor and may even deprive him of his means of livelihood and his
property while still having the same amount of debt against him that
existed at the time of the initial borrowing. Thus Riba generates
lethargy and tendency to unlawfully take over others' earnings; that
leads to self-indulgence.
Apparently the money earned on money makes a person opulent while
charity diminishes wealth. However, if one doesn't only physically see
using his eyes but also spiritually perceives using his heart it is in
fact just the opposite. Interest disjoints the society by creating
mutual dislike and jealousy while charity builds mutual love and trust.
It's the difference of ego-centric narrow mind versus generosity for the
larger good. One breeds class struggle while the other sprouts
homogeneity.
Mind you, the money-lender can even withhold his money as and when he
has the slightest fear of market deterioration. He creates trepidation
that can turn an exigency into a catastrophe. Thus, interest mars and
cripples the national economy. Conversely, through charitable
utilization of the people's riches the level of national prosperity
rises and so does the GDP.
Islamic economy: rules & instruments
Thus, in order to implement its economic policy objective Islam has
taken the following measures: Riba (usury or interest) has been
forbidden. Zakat has been made obligatory. The level of Sadaqah has been
raised to the extent of Qulil Afwa. Believers have been exhorted to
practice voluntary charity. Different kinds of atonements in kind
mandate out from the wealth turned towards ameliorating the downtrodden
in the society. The law of inheritance is aimed at ensuring that the
wealth left by every deceased person spreads among the largest circle of
the people. Stinginess has been condemned and generosity commended as a
noble moral quality. And, the well-to-do people have been told that in
their wealth there is a definite share of the beggar and the indigent,
which they must discharge not as charity but as the right of those
people.
This brings to the fore the necessity of an Islamic society or
government to organize its affairs in the following manner. The
ownership and control of the material resources of the community need to
be so distributed as best to subserve the common good. The operation of
the economic system must not result in the concentration of wealth and
means of production to the common detriment. The wealthy people should
not be allowed to monopolize the means and resources of wealth.
Mahajir-care: part of Islamic socio-economic system
Even though this Quranic injunction regarding circulation of wealth
(59.7) is for general application in the society, we need to note that,
at the time of the revelation if this ayah, the properties that were the
immediate object were the homes and related possessions that had fallen
to Muslims by the fleeing enemy. There's hardly a parallel in history
that, post victory, these God-gifted properties were allotted to the
incoming Mahajirs (emigrants). Here God expresses happiness that the
Ansars (local helpers) loved those who had migrated towards them and
entertained no desire in their hearts for what is given to the migrants
and, rather, preferred the migrants as the recipients of the booty even
though they themselves were in need. The Divine edict thus broadcast to
the world is that those who are saved from the greed of their own
hearts, are truly on the triumphant track.
The contextual intention of the verse is to point out that till
Resurrection it is the duty of the Islamic government and the Islamic
society to settle the people who are exiled and compelled to take refuge
in it because of being Muslims and to enable them to stand on their feet
economically.
In today's world, Muslim governments and societies are not discharging
this important obligation. Tens of thousands of Muslim refugees and
displaced persons (specially Rohingyas from Myanmar) need our attention
but we are oblivious of their plight or at least they do not figure in
our charitable calculations to the extent to which it has been mandated
in the scripture.
Lessons we need to take
Thus, it is important that the world's materially better placed class
appreciates God's purpose in creating humanity and His clear mandate
regarding the reality of His own ownership of all material resources. We
need to realize that some of us have only been nominated as part-time
custodians of small portions of these assets and the sources of income
emanating therefrom. Out of what each one of us is able to earn and
procure, we are supposed to retain only that much as is sufficient to
sustain us and our dependents in the family. The balance does not belong
to us and has to be incurred for others who are in need. By way of
implementing this broad Divine mandate, certain dos and don'ts have been
prescribed. Riba, that's earning money out of lending money and thus
exploiting the havenots, is forbidden; that's mostly known in today's
world as usury or interest. Instead, the extra funds available should be
spent as charity or at least for giving interest free benevolent loans.
The concomitant theme of all economic activity should be to ensure that
the community's wealth keeps on changing hands and circulating across
the entire social spectrum. In the process, the Mahajirs needed to
necessarily be rehabilitated with dignity. The Islamic societies and
governments should mull over this paradigm and incorporate it, in letter
and spirit, in their constitution as well as the day to day working.